按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
behaviouristsberofpig”subjects”throughatest；ha
therterinthesnoutandapearlneouslyresolve
thatpigsdonotrespondtothesightofjeerely
prostitutionofthescientificthod；forhatprofessorcasonofrochester
universityreadapaperattheninthannualinteationalnferenceofpsychologists
onthe”originandnatureofnannoyances；”ined21；000
kindsofannoyances；erdeductingduplicationsand”spuriousannoyances；”
erreducedto507；andinhese
”annoyances；”like26rksfor”hairinfood；”2for”thesightofabaldhead”and24
for”ckroaches”
1teachersllegererd；luiauniversity；feb；1930；p472；quotedby
abrahalexner：universities；arican；englishandge
sflexner；ibid”adissertationsubttedtothegraduatefacultyincandidacyfor
degreeofsterofarts；”universityofchicago
8flexner；ibid”adissertationsubttedinpartialfulfilntoftherequirentsof
kansasstateagriculturalllegefordegreeofdoctoroiscience”
acertainauntofstupiddrudgeryisofursepartandparceloftruescientific
ruescientificdisciplinecanenableascientisttotakedelightinthe
disverythatanearthhasacertainprotectivevering；foritisonthe
ainutelyobservedfactsthatsciencegregenerationto
generationtoitspresentgnificentattainntshoutthatscientifiutlook；and
ourandnsense；thechinesestnecessarilynsiderthestudyandobservationofthelifeofanearthorofagoldfishas
beneaththedignityofascholar
ivlogic
thisbringsustotheproblefchineselogic；hechinese
nceptionoftruthtruth；acrdingtochinese；canneverbeproved：itcanonlybe
suggestedchuangtselongagopointedoutthesubjectivityofknowledgeinhis
ckiwulun：
inanarguntbete；youthinkyouhavegotthebetterof；andi
ityoursuperioritythenareyoureallyright；andireallyhinki
havegotthebetterofyouandyouitsuperiority梩henareally
rightandyoureallyhright；orperhapsareh
knohusircledindarkness；andwhois
goingtoestablishthetruthifanhyouestabli**；thenhe
alreadyagreeshyou；sohoabli**ifoneh
establishthetruth；thenhealreadyagreese；sohoabli**if
onehbothofusestablishthetruth；thenhealreadydisagrees
hbothofus；sohoabli**ifonehbothofus
establishthetruth；thenhealreadyagreeshbothofus；sohoabli**
thusyouandiandotherpeoplecannotknohetruth；andhoforthe
otherone
acrdingtothistheoryofknoaybe
graspedbythendina”dialectichoutseone”knoisso
anner
of；”itcanthereforebefeltonlybyasortofintuitiveperceptionthechinese；hout
allnsology；essentiallyagreehit
insteadofrelyingonlogic；heyrelyonthe
perhapshealthiesenseanythinglikegentreasoningisunknownin
chineseliterature；forthechineseinherentlydisbelieveinitnsequentlyno
dialeisunknown
behardkarlgrenrecentlyanyargunts
usedbychinese”highercritics”inprovingthegenuinenessorspuriousnessofancient
eofthestakesreallyseeoafterthe
applicationoftheethodachineseneveresatreatiseoftenthousand；
orevenfivethousand；oestablishapointheputsdoeaboutit；
leavingittobesustainedordisprovedbyposterityonitsintrinsicritthatiswhy
chinesescholarsalanyllectionsof”notebooks；”called
shuipiorpichi；nsistingofunclassifiedparagraphs；inhe
authorshipofliteraryixedupesetsandsketchesofaredbeardedheroora
centipedeeatingrecluse
achineseauthorpresentsyouentsandthenstateshis
n；youseldoirseehirrivingatthenclusion；forthe
arguntsancevidencesareneverlong；butyouseeinaflashthathealreadyhasit
thebestofsuchnotebooks；likethejihchihluofkiyenhe
seventeenthcentury；establishtheireputation；notbytheirlogicbutbytheessential
rreents；erity
theetistheresultofyears
ofresearinationofasinglpointof
historicfactghthaveinvolvedrepeatedtripsandanencyclopaedicerudition；but
hiserrorsarediffidiately
visible；andcanonlybeappreciatedbecauseno
hasbeenabletoestablishapointagainsthi
thusnsense；akestheplaceof
induonsenseisoftensanerbecausethe
analyticreasoninglook
………………………………
第31节
sattruthbycuttingitupintovariousaspects；thusthrowing
theutoftheiaturalbearings；nsenseseizesthesituationasaliving
enhavearerobustnsensethann；andintisofany
ergenan
theyhaveauationinitstotalityhoutbeingdistractedbyits
individualaspeberdreandthe
tehsaopaoyenanunutholdnschats；theenarepicturedasthe
soundestjudgesofsituations；andtheirspeechhasatingitasarounded
elyfasonsenseisdangerous；
be；ic
brain；toevolveargunts”a；””b”and”c”tohisoaybe
likethesriddlerchan
uldperceiveinthelifeofhisownwife
thisreligionofnsensehasaphilosophicbasisitisinterestingtonotethatthe
chinesedonotjudgetherrectnessofapropositionbytheappealtoreasonalone；
butbythedoubleappealtoreasonandtohunnaturethechinesewordfor
”reasonableness”isckingli》posedoftents；ckingjencking
orhunnature；andlifienli；oretealreasonckingrepresentstheflexible；
hunelent；tablelaheuniverseoutofthe
binationofthesetesthestandardofjudgntforaurseof
actionoranhistoricalthesis
sothingofthisdistinaybeseenintheenglishntrastbetween”reason”
and”reasonableness”itanisareasoning；but
notareasonable；beingitsthis；butaddsthatnshouldtrytobeareasonable；andnotarelyreasoning；beingbythechinese；reasonableness
isplacedonahigherlevelthanreasonforract；analytical；
idealisticandinclinedtoes；thespiritofreasonablenessisalways
rerealistian；inclosertouchoretrulyunderstanding
andappreciativeoftherrectsituation
foraeeritisusuallysufficientforapropositiontobelogicallysoundfora
ustbeatthe
satiinacrdannatureinfact；tobe”inacrdan
nature；35tobechinching；isagreatesiderationthantobelogicalforatheory
uldbesologicalastobetotallydevoidoff&oasensethechinesearewilling
todoanythingagainstreason；buttheyacceptanythingthatisnotplausiblein
thelightofhunnaturethisspiritofreasonablenessandthisreligionofn
sensehaveastiortantbearingonthechineseidealoflife；andresultinthe
doean；hefolloer
vintuition
nevertheless；thistypeofthinkinghasitslitations；tooforthelogifn
sensearaffa